Passcode: 932368.
There is a difference, smaller scale has a lower return and somewhere the scale can be optimised, but changes are relatively small and would suggest that sticking with an installed or familiar scale may make sense, if you are confident that most of your products will be blockbusters..There is a natural upper limit to the.
and this maybe should be understood to prevent “traffic-jam” consequences..at low value products, scale appears to be.potentially critical.
to securing a positive cashflow.over the longer term.
This makes sense as over.
investing in larger scale, when the potential returns are low.We may end up creating loose-fit superstructures.
The superstructure contains the majority of the embodied carbon in a building.We could design these for a 100-year total life span, while the use of standardised components would make an interior refit possible every five to ten years.
In its initial configuration a building might function as an office block, but components could be taken out and the building changed into a residential building or school.At the end of its life, the various standardised components would be recycled, reused or redeployed, creating a circular economy.
(Editor: Magnetic Shoes)